World Voices Nexus: The WCCES Chronicle
  • Home
  • About WVN
    • President's Message
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Team
    • Call for Submissions
    • Reviewing Guidelines
  • WVN Issues
    • Vol. 1 No. 1 (Oct. 2017) >
      • Article 1 by Assie-Lumumba
      • Article 2 by Enrique Aguilar
      • Article 3 by Alasfour
      • Article 4 by Choi
      • Article 5 by Coxon & McLaughlin
      • Article 6 by Navarro Leal
      • Article 7 by Sindhi
    • Vol. 2 No. 1 (Feb. 2018) >
      • Article 1 by Asada
      • Article 2 by El Sayed
      • Article 3 by Hayhoe
      • Article 4 by Kayombo & Kavenuke
      • Article 5 by Mukherjee
      • Article 6 by Noorajan
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 2 No. 2 (Jun. 2018) >
      • Article 1 by Alaraimi
      • Article 2 by Alegado
      • Article 3 by Eriyagama
      • Article 4 by Pan
      • Article 5 by Sriprakash & Takayama
      • Article 6 by Waghid
      • Article 7 by Walterova
    • Vol. 2 No. 3 (Oct. 2018) >
      • Article 1 by Alam
      • Article 2 by Alhouti
      • Article 3 by Aung
      • Article 4 by Gakunga
      • Article 5 by Kambona & Intsiful
      • Article 6 by Sindhi
      • Article 7 by Soe
      • Tribute by Maherzi
    • Vol. 3 No. 1 (Feb. 2019) >
      • Article 1 by Latt
      • Article 2 by Kambona
      • Article 3 by Maciel
      • Article 4 by Mwanza
      • Article 5 by Sultana & Haque
      • New Year 2019 Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 3 No. 2 (Jun. 2019) >
      • Article 1 by Batra
      • Article 2 by Fermine
      • Article 3 by Ginsburg & Batista
      • Article 4 by Klein
      • Article 5 by Thakur & Deshmukh
    • Vol. 3 No. 3 (Oct. 2019) >
      • Article 1 by Inaba
      • Article 2 by Maherzi
      • Article 3 by Mwanza
      • Article 4 by Neema-Abooki & Kamanzi
      • Article 5 by Soe & Imran
    • Vol. 4 No. 1 (Feb. 2020) >
      • Article 1 by Kambona
      • Article 2 by Maherzi
      • Article 3 by Soe
      • Article 4 by Vakhovskyi
      • New Year 2020 Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 4 No. 2 (Jun. 2020) >
      • Obituary by AFEC
      • Article 1 by Assié-Lumumba
      • Article 2 by Latt
      • Article 3 by Sanga & Reynolds
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 4 No. 3 (Oct. 2020) >
      • Article 1 by Antonell and Rius
      • Article 2 by Aung & Chun
      • Article 3 by Soe
      • Article 4 by Win & Aung
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 5 No. 1 (Feb. 2021) >
      • Article 1 by Batista and Ribeiro-Silva
      • Article 2 by Bedi, Deshmukh, Ekanayake and Vitharana
      • Article 3 by Enkhtur, Li and Zhang
      • Article 4 by Karunathilaka
      • Article 5 by Romao
    • Vol. 5 No. 2 (Jun. 2021) >
      • Article 1 by Coulon
      • Article 2 by Gakunga and Owuor
      • Article 3 by Guallpa and Guallpa
      • Article 4 by Hou
      • Article 5 by Kumari and Vitharana
      • Article 6 by Ribeiro-Silva and Amorim
    • Vol. 5 No. 3 (Oct. 2021) >
      • Obituary by Assie-Lumumba
      • Article 1 by Bedi
      • Article 2 by Inaba
      • Article 3 by Senevirathne & Ekanayake
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 6 No. 1 (Feb. 2022) >
      • Article 1 by Apata and Paintsil
      • Article 2 by Nikita N. Deshmukh
      • Article 3 by Radhika G. Deshmukh and Narendra D. Deshmukh
      • New Year 2022 Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 6 No. 2 (Jun. 2022) >
      • Article 1 by Changamire and Kebede
      • Article 2 by Coulon
      • Article 3 by Geiger and Killen
      • Article 4 by Mackatiani and Likoko
      • Article 5 by Munoz
      • Article 6 by Navarro-Leal
    • Vol. 6 No. 3 (Oct. 2022) >
      • Article 1 by Amarasinghe
      • Article 2 by Chamanthi
      • Article 3 by Dutta, Hardikar, et al
      • Article 4 by Karasev et al
      • Obituary by Wolhuter and Herman
    • Vol. 7 No. 1 (Feb. 2023) >
      • Article 1 by Bekele, Amollo and Lilian
      • Article 2 by Deshmukh and Kharade
      • Article 3 by Mackatiani, Likoko and Mackatiani
      • Poem 1 by Maherzi
      • Poem 2 by Maherzi
  • Events
    • CIES 2023, Feb. 14-22, Washington D.C., USA
    • ICES 4th National Conference, Tel Aviv University, Israel, 20 June 2021
    • 2022 Virtual Conference of CESHK, 18-19 March 2022
    • ISCEST Nigeria 7th Annual International Conference, 30 Nov.-3 Dec. 2020
    • 3rd WCCES Symposium (Virtually through Zoom) 25-27 Nov. 2020
    • CESA 12th Biennial Conference, Kathmandu, Nepal, 26-28 Sept. 2020
    • CESI 10th International Conference, New Delhi, India, 9-11 Dec. 2019
    • SOMEC Forum, Mexico City, 13 Nov. 2018
    • WCCES Symposium, Geneva, 14-15 Jan. 2019
    • 54th EC Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 14 Jan. 2019
    • XVII World Congress of Comparative Education Societies, Cancún, Mexico, 20-24 May 2019
    • ISCEST Nigeria 5th Annual Conference, 3-6 Dec. 2018
    • CESI 9th International Conference, Vadodara, India, 14-16 Dec. 2018
    • ICES 3rd National Conference, Ben-Gurion University, Israel, 17 Jan. 2019
    • WCCES Retreat & EC Meeting, Johannesburg, 20-21 June 2018
    • WCCES Symposium, Johannesburg, 21-22 June 2018
    • 5th IOCES International Conference, 21-22 June 2018
    • International Research Symposium, Sonepat, India, 11-12 Dec. 2017
    • WCCES Info Session & Launch of Online Course on Practicing Nonviolence at CIES, 29 March 2018
    • WCCES Leadership Meeting at CIES, 28 March 2018
    • 52nd EC Meeting of WCCES, France, 10-11 Oct. 2017
    • UIA Round Table Asia Pacific, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 21-22 Sept. 2017
  • Online Courses
    • Practicing Nonviolence >
      • Module 1: Nature's Lessons
      • Module 2: Virtues of Nonviolence
      • Module 3: Fighting against Violence
      • Conclusion & the Pledge







​World Voices Nexus
The WCCES Chronicle
ISSN: 2522-7483
Vol. 5 No. 2, Jun. 2021
Article 6 by Ribeiro-Silva and Amorim

Finishing initial teacher education in lockdown — a gender perspective

5/8/2021

0 Comments

 
Abstract
When on the first day of September 2019 we began another academic year of the Teaching Practicum in the Initial Teacher Education of Physical Education we were far from thinking that six months from then we would be experiencing the greatest pandemic of this century with all its implications and consequences. From one day to the other, pre-service teachers were asked to  remotely experience the most important year of their initial teacher education, away from their school, their students, and all key actors.
            Mentoring the pre-service teachers during those months created in us the suspicion that the lockdown was experienced differently by females and males, thus this being the purpose of this study. To achieve this aim, we performed content semantic analysis of 20 narratives produced by 10 females and 10 males pre-service teachers enrolled in the Master’s Degree of Teaching Physical Education at the University of Coimbra. The results revealed that, despite the fact that most pre-service teachers found this lockdown very difficult, the females expressed their difficulty in reconciling home chores and caring for family members, with their Teaching Practicum. It was also female pre-service teachers who lost less income, given that their part-time jobs could be done remotely, which was not the case with most of their male colleagues. It was the male pre-service teachers who felt lonelier and missed their involvement in school, which could be justified due to have more time available.

Keywords: initial teacher education, physical education, lockdown, COVID-19

Introduction
The teaching practicum is perceived by most pre-service teachers (PSTs) as the most significant moment of their initial teacher education, considering that it is where PSTs put their theoretically knowledge acquired in the first years of academic education into practice (Flores, 2020; González-Calvo et al., 2020). Therefore, it is an academic year in which PSTs have high expectations, given that for the first time they will be a teacher in a real learning context, while having constant guidance and mentoring by two teachers.

When the world faced the greatest public health crisis, the consequent lockdown, and with it the end of face-to-face classes, pose enormous difficulties in all areas for which no one was prepared, including the educational field. Many were the students who were three months away of completing their initial teacher education and whose transition to remote education generated excessive insecurity due to the uncertainty of the situation (Varea & González-Calvo, 2020) and the lack of balance in life and academic expectations.

Their teachers felt the same, in particular those responsible for the teaching practicum, who had to continue their work resorting to their own teaching and mentoring experience and, above all, their common sense. The need to get to know pre-service teachers better in order to be able to respond to their necessities has never been more pressing (Delamarter & Ewart, 2020). 

Purpose of study
This study aims to understand how female and male pre-service teachers, enrolled in the Master’s Degree in Teaching Physical Education in the University of Coimbra (Portugal) during the academic year 2019/2020, experienced lockdown at a personal and academic level, in order to identify the most significant differences between genders so that we can intervene in a more adjust and informed way in possible future situations.

Methodology
This study is initiated by the existing concern for pre-service students and their difficulties, constraints and/or readiness experienced during the period of lockdown, corresponding to the last three months of their initial teacher education. We followed a qualitative methodology, applying a semantic criterion on content analysis (Bardin, 2011) of 20 narratives, with pre-defined dimensions (Personal-self and PST-self) but without pre-established categories.

Those narratives were produced voluntarily by physical education PSTs, 10 female and 10 male, after having completed their teaching practicum in basic and secondary education, urban and suburban schools, in central and north-central Portugal. For this narrative, a set of indicators was provided as a way to guide the narrative but not conditioning it. The aim of it was to let participants address subjects focused with the dilemma, which allowed us to obtain more consistent data and categorisation was facilitated.

Results
As mentioned earlier, the categorisation started from two dimensions: personal-self, in which it was intended to know the life conditions of the pre-service teachers and their household during lockdown; and PST-self, in which we wanted to understand how they had experienced the remote teaching practicum. When saturation of data occurred, for the personal-self dimension, we obtained five categories, ten subcategories and seven indicators; and for the PST-self dimension we gathered five categories, eleven subcategories and fifteen indicators for both genders. After careful analysis we decided to attribute the categories, subcategories and/or indicators to the gender that had a representation higher than 75% in that category, subcategory and/or indicator. Lower results than that were considered as perceptions common to both genders, thus not relevant for this study.

The following table (Table 1) shows the results obtained in the Personal-self category for female PSTs.

Table 1. Personal-self dimension for female PSTs

Picture
The following narratives show the female pre-service teachers’ report of their unsuitable adapted living conditions, specially the cohabitation with sick family members:
“When the lockdown started I had to go to my parents’ house, due to the fact that the student accommodation where I was required so. The working conditions were initially favourable, however and due to my mother’s health condition, my ability to concentrate and work started to decline.” — MF

Regarding the gear/material category, there were considered insufficient:
“I do not have internet at home (only a hotpot in one room) and I had to live all these months in that room, from morning to night in front of the computer. If I did not even got that weak signal, how would I teach remotely? How would I continue to be aware of everything that was going on?” — AC

With regard to the category repercussion of (new) family dynamics, we found in data the following difficulties: Reconciling tasks between the family aggregate, and Reconciling housework with teaching practicum:

“These months also changed my family routines, and my brother also stayed home with remote learning. I tried to adapt my schedule in order to work at a time when he did not have to attend classes because of the noise and for us two to be able to focus (…). Sometimes that was not possible (…) and I think that in this respect we fumbled a little but it was a situation what we could not control.” — CF
 
Concerning the male PSTs narratives, they stood out in two categories such as living conditions and loss of income (Table 2).

Table 2. Personal-self dimension for male PSTs

Picture
Despite the private narratives regarding this dimension, we can observe that the male PSTs’ experiences were mainly negative:

Absent parents
“On a personal level, during the lockdown I lived alone in my parents’ house. Since they are doctors, they were not able to come home.” — GF

Loss of income
“Since I teach swimming classes, having pools closed prevented me from working, which was very hard monetarily (…). Resorting to social support was the only way to overcome this difficulty, although it was not very personally rewarding.” — NG
 
Moving on to the PST-self dimension, the female PSTs narratives overlaps with their male colleagues narratives. This is seen in remote learning category and the difficulties subcategory (adapting to the unknown, the students’ lack of motivation and excess of work) and the successes subcategories (being able to teach students). Among the narratives the following categories were also highlighted: concern for students (well-being subcategory) and professional training (loss in professional training subcategory) (Table 3).

Table 3. PST-self dimension for female PSTs

Picture
In the PST-self dimension we can observe that for the female PSTs the most significant experiences relate to:

Remote learning — difficulties
a)    Adaptation to the unknown
“Since it is a new situation for everyone and the fact that there is no right way to deal with it, it has made it difficult to reach and respond to some problems.” — MF
b)    Lack of student motivation
“Overtime (…) the commitment and the will on the students’ part was disappearing, and there was a need to motivate them, realising that the times in question were difficult and exhausting.” — CD
c)    Excess of work
“The end of the 2nd and 3rd term ended up giving more work than it would in face-to-face classes.” — AS

Remote learning — successes
As for their successes, they were not very expressing, summing up to:
a)    Being able to teach students
“The successes achieved over these three months were to have managed to teach my students, to have taught classes in which the students learned new content and liked it.” — SR

Concern for students — well-being
“I always did my best for my students, so that they remained active and healthy.” — CF
 
As for the male PSTs, their narratives about the PST-self dimension overlaps with their female colleagues narratives, specially in the subcategory negative implications of non-classroom teaching in physical education (remote learning category). In this same category, five indicators stood out in the difficulties subcategories and four indicators stood out in the successes subcategories.
 
Table 4. PST-self dimension for male PSTs

Picture
In this dimension we can observe that, despite the difficulties, the male PSTs noticed several successes.

Remote teaching — Negative implications of remote teaching in physical education
“It seems obvious that physical education is practically incompatible with online classes and lockdown.” — PQ
“Physical education was an extremely penalised discipline with this situation, since face-to-face and practice with students was lost.” — LM

Remote teaching — Difficulties
a)    Control and monitor students
“The most difficult thing is to verify whether or not the students fulfil the requested practical tasks.” — RJ
“Although I encouraged all students to practice sport daily and reviewed the contents taught during the year, it became impossible to control the achievement of what I was proposing.” — RS
b)    Finding appropriate materials and pedagogical intervention
“During the teaching practicum, it was difficult to choose new strategies to implement in the online classes.” — PQ
“The biggest difficulties I felt were finding a suitable work methodology for all students and the physical education class, while being able to complete the projects and activities inherent to the teaching practicum.” — RJ
c)    Work with the teaching practicum group
“The weakest point was the difficulty I felt in working in a group, since there was not always compatible schedules for us to work together at the same time.” — RJ
d)    Work with unknown software
“At a professional level it was complicated due to the fact that I had to learn to work with different platforms for online classes.” — GF

Remote teaching — Successes
As for the successes in remote teaching, the male PSTs were much more articulate than their female colleagues, resulting in the following subcategories:
a)    Professional enrichment
“The greatest success of the remote teaching was to prepare myself for the future in case of being necessary again.” — RJ
“Finishing tasks inherent to the teaching practicum was rewarding since I learned to use other means of communication, new tools, new information, and communication technologies that will be useful in the future.” — MP
b)    Adaptation to unforeseen situations
“As positive aspects I highlight the ability we had to adapt teaching to a new reality, and the class showing availability to carry out small theoretical tasks related to the contents of the units of work covered in the 3rd term.” — MM
c)    Better relationships between the teaching practicum group
“Specifically in relation to the teaching practicum, our teaching practicum gourd adapted very well to the situation as we managed to meet whenever possible via Skype, and we helped each other as we recognised that the difficulties were diverse and together we would be able to overcome them much better.” — BF
d)    self-training
“I highlight as a positive aspect, the ability we had to have to find ways of professional progression, using different digital media, and even taking online training.” — BF

Final Reflections
From the data obtained and its analysis we can observe that the final stage of the teaching practicum was not experienced in the same way by female and male PSTs. Female PSTs took on the role of caregivers and houseworkers. As future teachers their concerns focused essentially on the physical and emotional well-being of their students, as well as the pupils’ motivation and learning ability. They narrated feeling overworked (Collins et al., 2020; United Nations, 2020) which could be the result of the accumulation of domestic responsibilities with their professional ones. Being the ones with the least loss of income, it is understood that they continued to work on their part-times. Unlike Georgieva et al. (2020) which argues that due to the nature of their job many women did not have the option of remote working, these female PSTs kept their work commitments remotely (most of them personal trainers).

The male PSTs narratives reported significant loss of income, due to the kind of work not being feasible to do online (such as coaches and swimming instructors). On the other hand, the lockdown gave them more availability to commit to their academic tasks (more than their female colleagues) which allowed them to focus on their concerns in controlling and monitor their students,  in finding adjusted forms of pedagogical intervention and in remote teacher development. They were also the ones who expressed their dissatisfaction with teaching physical education remotely.

Although traditional gender norms still persist, essentially attributing housework to women (Petts et al., 2018; Thébaud et al., 2019) leading them to a work overload (Livingston & Parker, 2019) it is important to recognise the care (evident in the results of female PSTs) as an important dimension of teachers’ professional identity, regardless of gender and not just exclusively as a maternal or parental activity (Granjo & Peixoto, 2018).
This study, although preliminary, showed us that the teaching practicum was experience differently by female and male PSTs during the lockdown, pointing to a greater organisational ability by females (given their multitasking) and a greater focus on academic tasks by males (given their time availability).

As teachers, we consider the results of relevance, given that not only they allowed us to confirm that the lockdown was lived differently by females and males, but we were able to identify some of those differences. This knowledge will allow us to have a more enlightened and adjusted educational intervention to the students’ living conditions. In short, these results will help us to lead students to success with less suffering on their part (and ours). It will be fundamental that in addition to the dimensions mentioned here, the affective-emotional dimension is also studies, contributing to a more complete view of the way female and male PSTs experience their teaching training in lockdown.
 
Bibliografia
 
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
Collins, C.;Landivar, L.; Ruppanner, L (2020).COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours,
Feminist Frontiers, Gender Work Organ, 1–12.DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12506
Delamarter, J., & Ewart, M. (2020). Responding to Student Teachers' Fears: How We're Adjusting during the COVID-19 Shutdowns, Northwest Journal of Teacher Education: Vol. 15 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. DOI: 10.15760/nwjte.2020.15.1.3
Flores, A., & Gago, M. (2020). Teacher Education in times of Covid-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709
Georgieva, K., Fabrizio, S., Lim, C., & Tavares, M. (2020). A covid-19 e as diferenças de género, Nações Unidas, Centro Regional de Informação para a Europa Ocidental. https://unric.org/pt/a-covid-19-e-as-diferencas-de-genero/
González-Calvo, G., Barba-Martín, R., Bores-Garcia, D., & Gallego-Lema, V. (2020). Aprender a Ser Docente Sin Estar en las Aulas: La COVID-19 Como Amenaza al Desarrollo Profesional del Futuro Profesorado, RIMCIS, 9(2), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2020.5783
Granjo, M., & Peixoto, F. (2018). Efeitos do género, tempo de serviço e orientação religiosa da escola na dimensão ética e afetiva da identidade docente. Psicologia,  32(2), 27-40. https://.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v32i2.1343
Varea, V., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, Education and Society, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814
Livingston, G., & Parker, K. (2019). 8 facts about American dads. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ 
Petts, R., Carlson, D., & Pepin, J. (2021). A gendered pandemic: Childcare, homeschooling, and parents' employment during COVID‐19, Feminist Frontiers, Gender Work Organ, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12614
Thébaud, S., Kornrich, S., & Ruppanner, L. (2019). Great housekeeping, great expectations: Gender and housework norms. Sociological Methods & Research, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119852395
United Nations (2020). Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond, Agosto, p2.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Elsa Ribeiro-Silva
    University of Coimbra, Faculty of Sport Science and Physical Education; Research Unit for Sport and Physical Education; Centre of 20th Century Interdisciplinary Studies

    Picture
    ​and Catarina Amorim
    Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education
    University of Coimbra
    Portugal
    Picture

    Archives

    May 2021

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Copyright © WCCES 2021
  • Home
  • About WVN
    • President's Message
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Team
    • Call for Submissions
    • Reviewing Guidelines
  • WVN Issues
    • Vol. 1 No. 1 (Oct. 2017) >
      • Article 1 by Assie-Lumumba
      • Article 2 by Enrique Aguilar
      • Article 3 by Alasfour
      • Article 4 by Choi
      • Article 5 by Coxon & McLaughlin
      • Article 6 by Navarro Leal
      • Article 7 by Sindhi
    • Vol. 2 No. 1 (Feb. 2018) >
      • Article 1 by Asada
      • Article 2 by El Sayed
      • Article 3 by Hayhoe
      • Article 4 by Kayombo & Kavenuke
      • Article 5 by Mukherjee
      • Article 6 by Noorajan
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 2 No. 2 (Jun. 2018) >
      • Article 1 by Alaraimi
      • Article 2 by Alegado
      • Article 3 by Eriyagama
      • Article 4 by Pan
      • Article 5 by Sriprakash & Takayama
      • Article 6 by Waghid
      • Article 7 by Walterova
    • Vol. 2 No. 3 (Oct. 2018) >
      • Article 1 by Alam
      • Article 2 by Alhouti
      • Article 3 by Aung
      • Article 4 by Gakunga
      • Article 5 by Kambona & Intsiful
      • Article 6 by Sindhi
      • Article 7 by Soe
      • Tribute by Maherzi
    • Vol. 3 No. 1 (Feb. 2019) >
      • Article 1 by Latt
      • Article 2 by Kambona
      • Article 3 by Maciel
      • Article 4 by Mwanza
      • Article 5 by Sultana & Haque
      • New Year 2019 Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 3 No. 2 (Jun. 2019) >
      • Article 1 by Batra
      • Article 2 by Fermine
      • Article 3 by Ginsburg & Batista
      • Article 4 by Klein
      • Article 5 by Thakur & Deshmukh
    • Vol. 3 No. 3 (Oct. 2019) >
      • Article 1 by Inaba
      • Article 2 by Maherzi
      • Article 3 by Mwanza
      • Article 4 by Neema-Abooki & Kamanzi
      • Article 5 by Soe & Imran
    • Vol. 4 No. 1 (Feb. 2020) >
      • Article 1 by Kambona
      • Article 2 by Maherzi
      • Article 3 by Soe
      • Article 4 by Vakhovskyi
      • New Year 2020 Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 4 No. 2 (Jun. 2020) >
      • Obituary by AFEC
      • Article 1 by Assié-Lumumba
      • Article 2 by Latt
      • Article 3 by Sanga & Reynolds
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 4 No. 3 (Oct. 2020) >
      • Article 1 by Antonell and Rius
      • Article 2 by Aung & Chun
      • Article 3 by Soe
      • Article 4 by Win & Aung
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 5 No. 1 (Feb. 2021) >
      • Article 1 by Batista and Ribeiro-Silva
      • Article 2 by Bedi, Deshmukh, Ekanayake and Vitharana
      • Article 3 by Enkhtur, Li and Zhang
      • Article 4 by Karunathilaka
      • Article 5 by Romao
    • Vol. 5 No. 2 (Jun. 2021) >
      • Article 1 by Coulon
      • Article 2 by Gakunga and Owuor
      • Article 3 by Guallpa and Guallpa
      • Article 4 by Hou
      • Article 5 by Kumari and Vitharana
      • Article 6 by Ribeiro-Silva and Amorim
    • Vol. 5 No. 3 (Oct. 2021) >
      • Obituary by Assie-Lumumba
      • Article 1 by Bedi
      • Article 2 by Inaba
      • Article 3 by Senevirathne & Ekanayake
      • Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 6 No. 1 (Feb. 2022) >
      • Article 1 by Apata and Paintsil
      • Article 2 by Nikita N. Deshmukh
      • Article 3 by Radhika G. Deshmukh and Narendra D. Deshmukh
      • New Year 2022 Poem by Maherzi
    • Vol. 6 No. 2 (Jun. 2022) >
      • Article 1 by Changamire and Kebede
      • Article 2 by Coulon
      • Article 3 by Geiger and Killen
      • Article 4 by Mackatiani and Likoko
      • Article 5 by Munoz
      • Article 6 by Navarro-Leal
    • Vol. 6 No. 3 (Oct. 2022) >
      • Article 1 by Amarasinghe
      • Article 2 by Chamanthi
      • Article 3 by Dutta, Hardikar, et al
      • Article 4 by Karasev et al
      • Obituary by Wolhuter and Herman
    • Vol. 7 No. 1 (Feb. 2023) >
      • Article 1 by Bekele, Amollo and Lilian
      • Article 2 by Deshmukh and Kharade
      • Article 3 by Mackatiani, Likoko and Mackatiani
      • Poem 1 by Maherzi
      • Poem 2 by Maherzi
  • Events
    • CIES 2023, Feb. 14-22, Washington D.C., USA
    • ICES 4th National Conference, Tel Aviv University, Israel, 20 June 2021
    • 2022 Virtual Conference of CESHK, 18-19 March 2022
    • ISCEST Nigeria 7th Annual International Conference, 30 Nov.-3 Dec. 2020
    • 3rd WCCES Symposium (Virtually through Zoom) 25-27 Nov. 2020
    • CESA 12th Biennial Conference, Kathmandu, Nepal, 26-28 Sept. 2020
    • CESI 10th International Conference, New Delhi, India, 9-11 Dec. 2019
    • SOMEC Forum, Mexico City, 13 Nov. 2018
    • WCCES Symposium, Geneva, 14-15 Jan. 2019
    • 54th EC Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 14 Jan. 2019
    • XVII World Congress of Comparative Education Societies, Cancún, Mexico, 20-24 May 2019
    • ISCEST Nigeria 5th Annual Conference, 3-6 Dec. 2018
    • CESI 9th International Conference, Vadodara, India, 14-16 Dec. 2018
    • ICES 3rd National Conference, Ben-Gurion University, Israel, 17 Jan. 2019
    • WCCES Retreat & EC Meeting, Johannesburg, 20-21 June 2018
    • WCCES Symposium, Johannesburg, 21-22 June 2018
    • 5th IOCES International Conference, 21-22 June 2018
    • International Research Symposium, Sonepat, India, 11-12 Dec. 2017
    • WCCES Info Session & Launch of Online Course on Practicing Nonviolence at CIES, 29 March 2018
    • WCCES Leadership Meeting at CIES, 28 March 2018
    • 52nd EC Meeting of WCCES, France, 10-11 Oct. 2017
    • UIA Round Table Asia Pacific, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 21-22 Sept. 2017
  • Online Courses
    • Practicing Nonviolence >
      • Module 1: Nature's Lessons
      • Module 2: Virtues of Nonviolence
      • Module 3: Fighting against Violence
      • Conclusion & the Pledge